On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 12:51:56PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > > > I do not remember seeing any real failures, this was a theoretical > > > window. So, we could potentially simply remove these locks until we > > > see a real boot failure in some interrupt thread. The allocation has > > > to be rather large as well. > > > > Yes please! We are really great at over complicating and over > > engineering stuff based on theoretical issues and build on top of that > > and make the code even more complex because nobody dares to re-evaluate > > and so on. > > I will submit a patch (or revert) whichever is cleaner. I had thought people would be concerned about that window. I believe the quote from the time it was being discussed was "rare failures suck." They very much do :) but in this case I think any failure would be relatively easy to diagnose. So great, simpler is always better, and I'll wait for what you send, Pasha. Alternatively, if you won't be able to get to it for a while, I can write it up, having thoroughly paged all this in over the past week.
