Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Do not high throttle allocators based on wraparound
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Do not high throttle allocators based on wraparound
From
: Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:25:34 +0100
Cc
: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20200331152424.GA1019937@chrisdown.name
>
References
: <
20200331152424.GA1019937@chrisdown.name
>
Andrew, this is a pretty bad one that could definitely affect memory.high
users. We should probably expedite it going in.
Sorry for the trouble, especially on a -stable patch...
References
:
[PATCH] mm, memcg: Do not high throttle allocators based on wraparound
From:
Chris Down
Prev by Date:
[PATCH] mm, memcg: Do not high throttle allocators based on wraparound
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu/tree: Use GFP_MEMALLOC for alloc memory to free memory pattern
Previous by thread:
[PATCH] mm, memcg: Do not high throttle allocators based on wraparound
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Do not high throttle allocators based on wraparound
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[IETF Annouce]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[eCos]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]
