From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> Since there is newly introduced kvfree_rcu() API, there is no need in queuing and using call_rcu() to kvfree() an object after the GP. Remove kvfree_rcu_local() function and replace call_rcu() by new kvfree_rcu() API that does the same but in more efficient way. Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/list_lru.c | 13 +++---------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c index 386424688f805..69becdb224080 100644 --- a/mm/list_lru.c +++ b/mm/list_lru.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/memcontrol.h> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h> #include "slab.h" #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM @@ -383,21 +384,13 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; /* * This is called when shrinker has already been unregistered, - * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu_local(). + * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu(). */ memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true); __memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids); kvfree(memcg_lrus); } -static void kvfree_rcu_local(struct rcu_head *head) -{ - struct list_lru_memcg *mlru; - - mlru = container_of(head, struct list_lru_memcg, rcu); - kvfree(mlru); -} - static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, int old_size, int new_size) { @@ -429,7 +422,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new); spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); - call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu_local); + kvfree_rcu(old, rcu); return 0; } -- 2.26.0.rc2.310.g2932bb562d-goog