Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 22/22] 22: perf: Documentation for perf uprobes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2011/06/07 22:02), Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Modify perf-probe.txt to include uprobe documentation

Sorry, Nak this. I hope to see better uniformed interface for
both of uprobe and kprobe, even after we support debuginfo for
uprobe.

I mean, if uprobe always requires a user-space binary, it should
be specified with -u option instead of --exe and @EXE.

I think this simplifies perf probe usage, it implies;

# perf probe [-k KERN] [...]  // Control probes in kernel
# perf probe -m MOD [...]     // Control probes in MOD module
# perf probe -u EXE [...]     // Control probes on EXE file

Thank you,


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]