On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:35 AM Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 3/24/20 4:12 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> > On 3/23/20 11:55 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> static ssize_t dev_dax_resize(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> >> struct dev_dax *dev_dax, resource_size_t size)
> >> {
> >> resource_size_t avail = dax_region_avail_size(dax_region), to_alloc;
> >> - resource_size_t dev_size = range_len(&dev_dax->range);
> >> + resource_size_t dev_size = dev_dax_size(dev_dax);
> >> struct resource *region_res = &dax_region->res;
> >> struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> >> - const char *name = dev_name(dev);
> >> struct resource *res, *first;
> >> + resource_size_t alloc = 0;
> >> + int rc;
> >>
> >> if (dev->driver)
> >> return -EBUSY;
> >> @@ -684,38 +766,47 @@ static ssize_t dev_dax_resize(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> >> * allocating a new resource.
> >> */
> >> first = region_res->child;
> >> - if (!first)
> >> - return __alloc_dev_dax_range(dev_dax, dax_region->res.start,
> >> - to_alloc);
> >
> > You probably want to retain the condition above?
> >
> > Otherwise it removes the ability to create new devices or resizing it , once we
> > have zero-ed the last one.
> >
>
> A quick unit test that I had stashed here to help explain what I mean:
>
> cd /sys/bus/dax/devices
> # dax0.0 is the only dax device in the corresponding dax_region
> echo dax0.0 > dax0.0/driver/unbind
> echo 0 > dax0.0/size
> # Shouldn't fail but returns -ENOSPC despite having
> # the full region available
> cat $(readlink -f dax0.0/../dax_region/available_size) > dax0.0/size
Thanks! Will incorporate that test before resending the series.
