Re: [PATCH v5 03/38] kmsan: gfp: introduce __GFP_NO_KMSAN_SHADOW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 5:19 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed 25-03-20 17:12:14, glider@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > This flag is to be used by KMSAN runtime to mark that newly created
> > memory pages don't need KMSAN metadata backing them.
>
> I really dislike an idea of the gfp flag. If you need some form of
> exclusion for kmsan allocations then follow the pattern of memalloc_no{fs,io}_{save,restore}
> History tells us that single usecase gfp flags are too tempting to abuse
> and using incorrectly.

Great idea, will do!
Guess PF_ flags isn't a scarce resource?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux