Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] mm/hmm/test: add self tests for HMM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 3/21/20 2:00 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 05:31:05PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
This series adds basic self tests for HMM and are intended for Jason
Gunthorpe's rdma tree which has a number of HMM patches applied.

Changes v7 -> v8:
Rebased to Jason's rdma/hmm tree, plus Jason's 6 patch series
   "Small hmm_range_fault() cleanups".
Applied a number of changes from Jason's comments.

Changes v6 -> v7:
Rebased to linux-5.6.0-rc6
Reverted back to just using mmu_interval_notifier_insert() and making
   this series only introduce HMM self tests.

Changes v5 -> v6:
Rebased to linux-5.5.0-rc6
Refactored mmu interval notifier patches
Converted nouveau to use the new mmu interval notifier API

Changes v4 -> v5:
Added mmu interval notifier insert/remove/update callable from the
   invalidate() callback
Updated HMM tests to use the new core interval notifier API

Changes v1 -> v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20191104222141.5173-1-rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx

Ralph Campbell (3):
   mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM
   mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM
   MAINTAINERS: add HMM selftests

  MAINTAINERS                            |    3 +
  include/uapi/linux/test_hmm.h          |   59 ++

Isn't UAPI folder supposed to be for user-visible interfaces that follow
the rule of non-breaking user space and not for selftests?

Thanks


Most of the other kernel module tests seem to invoke the test as part of the
module load/init. I'm open to moving it if there is a more appropriate location.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux