> On 19-Mar-2020, at 6:53 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3/19/20 9:52 AM, Sachin Sant wrote: >> >>> OK how about this version? It's somewhat ugly, but important is that the fast >>> path case (c->page exists) is unaffected and another common case (c->page is >>> NULL, but node is NUMA_NO_NODE) is just one extra check - impossible to avoid at >>> some point anyway. >>> >> >> I attempted the suggested tests. >> >> Test 1: March 18 linux-next + Patch 1 [1] + Patch 2 [2] >> >> Machine boots fine. numactl o/p after boot: > > Great, thanks! Can I add your Tested-by: then? Sure. Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thank you for the fix. Thanks -Sachin
