On 3/18/20 4:32 AM, js1304@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> > > classzone_idx is just different name for high_zoneidx now. > So, integrate them and add some comment to struct alloc_context > in order to reduce future confusion about the meaning of this variable. > > In addition to integration, this patch also renames high_zoneidx > to highest_zoneidx since it represents more precise meaning. 2 years ago I suggested max_zone_idx. Not insisting, but perhaps max_zoneidx would simply be shorter than highest_zoneidx, while saying the same thing? Also I wonder if we still need the accessor ac_classzone_idx() (before rename), or just replace it with ac->highest_zoneidx (or whatever the final name is) instead of renaming it? Thanks! Vlastimil
