Re: [PATCH 1/4] hugetlbfs: add arch_hugetlb_valid_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/18/20 3:52 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Sounds good.  I'll incorporate those changes into a v2, unless someone
> else with has a different opinion.
> 
> BTW, this patch should not really change the way the code works today.
> It is mostly a movement of code.  Unless I am missing something, the
> existing code will always allow setup of PMD_SIZE hugetlb pages.

Hah, I totally skipped over the old code in the diff.

It looks like we'll disable hugetblfs *entirely* if PSE isn't supported.
 I think this is actually wrong, but nobody ever noticed.  I think you'd
have to be running as a guest under a hypervisor that's lying about PSE
not being supported *and* care about 1GB pages.  Nobody does that.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux