On 16.03.20 16:12, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 11-03-20 13:30:22, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> The name is misleading. Let's just name it like the online_type name we >> expose to user space ("online"). > > I would disagree the name is misleading. It just says that you want to > online and keep the zone type. Nothing I would insist on though. "online and keep the zone type" - that's not what's happening. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb