Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 3/5/20 10:15 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> @@ -1266,7 +1267,7 @@ int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) >> * Make sure we have a private signal table and that >> * we are unassociated from the previous thread group. >> */ >> - retval = de_thread(current); >> + retval = de_thread(bprm, current); > > can we get rid of passing current as parameter here? With a separate patch. It makes the patch less clear if I make that change in this one. Eric
