On Thu 05-03-20 10:46:21, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: [...] > I am aware of this. I was just exploring if there was a possibility of > addressing the warning, since if we leave all the warnings in scenarios like > randconfig can cause confusion in between real and non real issues. I would very much like to address _real_ warnings. This one is just bugus. I do not see a fix that would be sensible. Wrapping the helper by ifdefs is just going to make the resulting code worse because there is nothing really specific to swap there. Marking it __maybe_unused will just paper over the report and allow the function to bitrot when it is not used anymore. So for now I would just live with the warning unless it is really causing any real problems. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
