Re: Memory reclaim protection and cgroup nesting (desktop use)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Memory reclaim protection and cgroup nesting (desktop use)
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:02:31 -0700
Cc: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200304163044.GF189690@mtj.thefacebook.com>
Organization: LWN.net
References: <d4826b9e568f1ab7df19f94c409df11956a8e262.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20200304163044.GF189690@mtj.thefacebook.com>

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 11:30:44 -0500
Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > (In a realistic scenario I expect to have swap and then reserving maybe
> > a few hundred MiB; DAMON might help with finding good values.)  
> 
> What's DAMON?

	https://lwn.net/Articles/812707/

jon

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Memory reclaim protection and cgroup nesting (desktop use)
  - From: Tejun Heo

References:
- Memory reclaim protection and cgroup nesting (desktop use)
  - From: Benjamin Berg
- Re: Memory reclaim protection and cgroup nesting (desktop use)
  - From: Tejun Heo

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: Make mem_cgroup_id_get_many dependent on MMU and MEMCG_SWAP
Next by Date: kdump twirling - does not finish - commit 326e1b8f83a4318b09033ef754f40c785aed5e68
Previous by thread: Re: Memory reclaim protection and cgroup nesting (desktop use)
Next by thread: Re: Memory reclaim protection and cgroup nesting (desktop use)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux