On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:45 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 09:23:27AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> From: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> It turns out that there is one use case for programs being able to
> write to swap devices, and that is the userspace hibernation code.
You might want to start a separate thread for this... :)
Right
> Quick fix: disable the S_SWAPFILE check if hibernation is configured.
>
> Fixes: 1638045c3677 ("mm: set S_SWAPFILE on blockdev swap devices")
Also, this should be
Fixes: dc617f29dbe5 ("vfs: don't allow writes to swap files")
Of course
since we still want to set S_SWAPFILE on active swap devices.
> Reported-by: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Marian Klein <mkleinsoft@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> fs/block_dev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: b/fs/block_dev.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -2001,7 +2001,8 @@ ssize_t blkdev_write_iter(struct kiocb *
> if (bdev_read_only(I_BDEV(bd_inode)))
> return -EPERM;
>
> - if (IS_SWAPFILE(bd_inode))
> + /* uswsusp needs to write to the swap */
> + if (IS_SWAPFILE(bd_inode) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIBERNATION))
...&& hibernation_available() ? That way we can configure this
dynamically.
Then it would just be "if (IS_SWAPFILE(bd_inode) &&
!hibernation_available())", right?
Thanks for taking this on, I'll go self-NAK the revert patch I sent
yesterday.
Thanks,
Dom
