Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: fix possible use after free in dmam_pool_destroy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Maxin B John <maxin.john@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: fix possible use after free in dmam_pool_destroy()
From: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:05:33 +0200
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dima@xxxxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, segooon@xxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, jkosina@xxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: linux-mm-outgoing@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: int-list-linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BANLkTimYw-WAK3Hd21XQWrjBn_1+wRMzUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/4.6 beta5 (Linux/2.6.37-12-desktop; KDE/4.6.3; i686; ; )

Maxin B John wrote:

> Could you please let me know your thoughts on this patch ?

Makes absolute sense to me.

Reviewed-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@xxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: fix possible use after free in dmam_pool_destroy()
  - From: Maxin B John

References:
- Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: fix possible use after free in dmam_pool_destroy()
  - From: Maxin B John
- Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: fix possible use after free in dmam_pool_destroy()
  - From: Maxin B John

Prev by Date: Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix assertion mapping->nrpages == 0 in end_writeback()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: fix possible use after free in dmam_pool_destroy()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: fix possible use after free in dmam_pool_destroy()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]