On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:50:03PM +0000, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The variable max_addr is being initialized with a value that is never > read and it is being updated later with a new value. The initialization > is redundant and can be removed. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/memblock.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index eba94ee3de0b..4d06bbaded0f 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -1698,7 +1698,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init_memblock __find_max_addr(phys_addr_t limit) > > void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit) > { > - phys_addr_t max_addr = PHYS_ADDR_MAX; > + phys_addr_t max_addr; > > if (!limit) > return; > -- > 2.25.0 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.