Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Huge page-table entries for TTM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:08:04 +0100 Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm wondering what's the best way here to get the patches touching mm 
> reviewed and accepted?
> While drm people and VMware internal people have looked at them, I think 
> the huge_fault() fallback splitting and the introduction of 
> vma_is_special_huge() needs looking at more thoroughly.
> 
> Apart from that, if possible, I think the best way to merge this series 
> is also through a DRM tree.

Patches 1-3 look OK to me.  I just had a few commenting/changelogging
niggles.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux