Re: [PATCH mm 1/2] mm: Define pte_index as macro for x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:57 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Arjun,
>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:46:56 -0800 Arjun Roy <arjunroy.kdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > index 7e118660bbd9..6658c04bce83 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > @@ -823,6 +823,9 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_index(unsigned long address)
> >   */
> >  #define mk_pte(page, pgprot)   pfn_pte(page_to_pfn(page), (pgprot))
> >
> > +/* Degenerative definition so we can test if pte_index is defined for arch. */
> > +#define pte_index pte_index
>
> You should put this definition directly above the static inline function.
>
> i.e.
>
> #define pte_index pte_index
> static inline unsigned long pte_index(unsigned long address)
>         ...
>
Done.

-Arjun

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux