Re: [PATCH v3 04/27] ocxl: Remove unnecessary externs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:26:34 +1100
"Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2020 7:15 PM
> > To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx; Aneesh Kumar K . V
> > <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@xxxxxxxxx>;
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Paul Mackerras
> > <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>; Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Frederic
> > Barrat <fbarrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Donnellan <ajd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>;
> > Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>; Dave Jiang
> > <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>; Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Morton
> > <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mahesh Salgaonkar
> > <mahesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Madhavan Srinivasan
> > <maddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Cédric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxx>; Anju T
> > Sudhakar <anju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Hari Bathini
> > <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Greg
> > Kurz <groug@xxxxxxxx>; Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>; Masahiro
> > Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Alexey Kardashevskiy
> > <aik@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-
> > dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/27] ocxl: Remove unnecessary externs
> > 
> > On 02/21/20 at 02:26pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> > > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Function declarations don't need externs, remove the existing ones so
> > > they are consistent with newer code
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h | 32 ++++++++++++++---------------
> > >  include/misc/ocxl.h                 |  6 +++---
> > >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > > index 0b2a6707e555..b23c99bc0c84 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > > @@ -9,29 +9,27 @@
> > >  #define PNV_OCXL_TL_BITS_PER_RATE       4
> > >  #define PNV_OCXL_TL_RATE_BUF_SIZE
> > ((PNV_OCXL_TL_MAX_TEMPLATE+1) * PNV_OCXL_TL_BITS_PER_RATE / 8)
> > >
> > > -extern int pnv_ocxl_get_actag(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 *base, u16
> > *enabled,
> > > -			u16 *supported);
> > 
> > It works w or w/o extern when declare functions. Searching 'extern'
> > under include can find so many functions with 'extern' adding. Do we have
> a
> > explicit standard if we should add or remove 'exter' in function
> declaration?
> > 
> > I have no objection to this patch, just want to make clear so that I can
> handle
> > it w/o confusion.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Baoquan
> > 
> 
> For the OpenCAPI driver, we have settled on not having 'extern' on
> functions.
> 
> I don't think I've seen a standard that supports or refutes this, but it
> does not value add.
> 

FWIW this is a warning condition for checkpatch:

$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f include/misc/ocxl.h

[...]

CHECK: extern prototypes should be avoided in .h files
#176: FILE: include/misc/ocxl.h:176:
+extern int ocxl_afu_irq_alloc(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int *irq_id);

[...]





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux