Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] mm/sparsemem: pfn_to_page is not valid yet on SPARSEMEM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:57 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:25:15PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:05 PM Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > When we use SPARSEMEM instead of SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, pfn_to_page()
> > > doesn't work before sparse_init_one_section() is called. This leads to a
> > > crash when hotplug memory:
> >
> > I'd also add:
> >
> > "On x86 the impact is limited to x86_32 builds, or x86_64
> > configurations that override the default setting for
> > SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP".
>
> Do we also want to check how it affects, say, arm64, ia64 and ppc? ;-)

Sure, I just did not take the time to look up their respective default
stances on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. For a distro looking to backport this
commit I think it's helpful for them to understand if they are exposed
or not.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux