Re: [Bug 206401] kernel panic on Hyper-V after 5 minutes due to memory hot-add

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/11/20 at 04:41pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:07:41 +0800 Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > >On 02/10/20 at 02:09pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > >> On 02/09/20 at 09:56pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:40:27 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> > 
> > >> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > On 02/09/20 at 09:32pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> > > > On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:25:48 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206401
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > > An oops during mem hotadd.  Could someone please take a look when
> > >> > > > convenient?
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > This has been addressed by Wei Yang's patch, please check it here:
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200209104826.3385-7-bhe@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >> > > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > hm, OK, thanks.  It's unfortunate that a 5.5 fix is buried in a
> > >> > six-patch series which is still in progress!  Can we please merge that
> > >> > as a standalone fix with a cc:stable, Fixes:, etc?
> > >
> > >Maybe can add Fixes tag as follow when merge:
> > >
> > >Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
> > >
> 
> The reporter (cc'ed here) is still seeing issues:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206401
> 
> Could we please continue this investigation via emailed reply-to-all,
> rather than via the bugzilla interface?

Yes, people prefer mailing list to discuss issues.

Hi T.Kabe, 

Could you provide the call trace again after below patch is applied?
The comment #9 in bugzilla is not very clear to me.

mm/sparsemem: pfn_to_page is not valid yet on SPARSEMEM
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200209104826.3385-7-bhe@xxxxxxxxxx

And, as you said, applying above patch, and do not call
__free_pages_core() in generic_online_page() will work. I doubt it,
because without __free_pages_core(), your added pages are not added
into buddy for managing. I think we should make clear this problem
firstly, in order not to introduce new problem by improper work around,
then check next.

Thanks
Baoquan








[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux