On 02/06/20 at 09:55am, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 04.02.20 06:06, Baoquan He wrote: > > In commit 357b4da50a62 ("x86: respect memory size limiting via mem= > > parameter") a global varialbe max_mem_size is added to store > > the value parsed from 'mem= ', then checked when memory region is > > added. This truly stops those DIMMs from being added into system memory > > during boot-time. > > > > However, it also limits the later memory hotplug functionality. Any > > DIMM can't be hotplugged any more if its region is beyond the > > max_mem_size. We will get errors like: > > > > [ 216.387164] acpi PNP0C80:02: add_memory failed > > [ 216.389301] acpi PNP0C80:02: acpi_memory_enable_device() error > > [ 216.392187] acpi PNP0C80:02: Enumeration failure > > > > This will cause issue in a known use case where 'mem=' is added to > > the hypervisor. The memory that lies after 'mem=' boundary will be > > assigned to KVM guests. After commit 357b4da50a62 merged, memory > > can't be extended dynamically if system memory on hypervisor is not > > sufficient. > > > > So fix it by also checking if it's during boot-time restricting to add > > memory. Otherwise, skip the restriction. > > > > And also add this use case to document of 'mem=' kernel parameter. > > > > Fixes: 357b4da50a62 ("x86: respect memory size limiting via mem= parameter") > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2->v3: > > In discussion of v1 and v2, People have concern about the use case > > related to the code change. So add the use case into patch log and > > document of 'mem=' in kernel-parameters.txt. > > > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 13 +++++++++++-- > > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 8 +++++++- > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > > index ddc5ccdd4cd1..b809767e5f74 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > > @@ -2533,13 +2533,22 @@ > > For details see: Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.rst > > > > mem=nn[KMG] [KNL,BOOT] Force usage of a specific amount of memory > > - Amount of memory to be used when the kernel is not able > > - to see the whole system memory or for test. > > + Amount of memory to be used in cases as follows: > > + > > + 1 for test; > > + 2 when the kernel is not able to see the whole system memory; > > + 3 memory that lies after 'mem=' boundary is excluded from > > + the hypervisor, then assigned to KVM guests. > > I remember that there were more use cases, but forgot where that was > documented :) In fact, as long as it's not used for test, hotplug will be helpful, e.g the 2nd use case. We use 'mem=' to skip these bad part of boot memory DIMMs, while hotplug can help us to extend RAM with good DIMMs. No need to discard the partly broken memmory board. > > I do wonder if we want to change that now without anybody complaining. > Yes, I brought up a possible use case but don't know if it is relevant > in practice (IOW, nobody complained yet :) ). Yes, I should hold it a while. Worry it's not clear enough. But in kernel-parameters.txt, I can't write too many details about use case. > > Would like to get Michals opinion on this. Sure, will hold. Thanks.