On 02/06/20 at 06:56am, Wei Yang wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:48:11PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > >Hi Wei Yang, > > > >On 02/05/20 at 05:59pm, Wei Yang wrote: > >> >diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > >> >index f294918f7211..8dafa1ba8d9f 100644 > >> >--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c > >> >+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > >> >@@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, > >> > if (pfn) { > >> > zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn; > >> > zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn; > >> >+ } else { > >> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; > >> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0; > >> > } > >> > } else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) { > >> > /* > >> >@@ -405,34 +408,11 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, > >> > start_pfn); > >> > if (pfn) > >> > zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1; > >> >+ else { > >> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; > >> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0; > >> >+ } > >> > } > >> > >> If it is me, I would like to take out these two similar logic out. > > > >I also like this style. > >> > >> For example: > >> > >> if () { > >> } else if () { > >> } else { > >> goto out; > >Here the last else is unnecessary, right? > > > > I am afraid not. > > If the range is not the first or last, we would leave pfn not initialized. Ah, you are right. I forgot that one. Then pfn can be assigned the zone_start_pfn as the old code. Then the following logic is the same as the original code, find_smallest_section_pfn()/find_biggest_section_pfn() have done the iteration the old for loop was doing. unsigned long pfn = zone_start_pfn; if () { } else if () { } /* The zone has no valid section */ if (!pfn) { zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; zone->spanned_pages = 0; }