On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 18:16 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:43:58 +0800 Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 06:21 +0800, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > > > > > On 11/12/19 9:53 AM, Walter Wu wrote: > > > > Test negative size in memmove in order to verify whether it correctly > > > > get KASAN report. > > > > > > > > Casting negative numbers to size_t would indeed turn up as a large > > > > size_t, so it will have out-of-bounds bug and be detected by KASAN. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi Andrey, Dmitry, Andrew, > > > > Would you tell me why this patch-sets don't merge into linux-next tree? > > We lost something? > > > > In response to [1/2] Andrey said "So let's keep this code as this" and > you said "I will send a new v5 patch tomorrow". So we're awaiting a v5 > patchset? > Hi Andrew, The [1/2] patch discussion shows below. Thanks for Dimitry help to explain it. So that v4 patchset got Andrey's signature. Because I see Andrey said "But I see you point now. No objections to the patch in that case." @Andrey, if I have an incorrect understanding, please let me know. Thanks for your help. https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/21/1019 https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/21/1020 Walter
