On Sun 19-01-20 11:06:36, Wei Yang wrote:
> Label out_flush is just outside the loop, so break the loop is enough.
I find the explicit label easier to follow than breaking out of the
loop. Especially when there is another break out of the loop with a
different label.
While the patch is correct I find the resulting code worse readable.
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 2a857fec65b6..59bfae11b9d6 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1621,22 +1621,22 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
>
> err = -EFAULT;
> if (get_user(p, pages + i))
> - goto out_flush;
> + break;
> if (get_user(node, nodes + i))
> - goto out_flush;
> + break;
> addr = (unsigned long)untagged_addr(p);
>
> /* Check node if it is not checked. */
> if (current_node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node != current_node) {
> err = -ENODEV;
> if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> - goto out_flush;
> + break;
> if (!node_state(node, N_MEMORY))
> - goto out_flush;
> + break;
>
> err = -EACCES;
> if (!node_isset(node, task_nodes))
> - goto out_flush;
> + break;
> }
>
> if (current_node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> @@ -1676,9 +1676,9 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
> */
> err = store_status(status, i, err ? : current_node, 1);
> if (err)
> - goto out_flush;
> + break;
> }
> -out_flush:
> +
> /* Make sure we do not overwrite the existing error */
> err1 = move_pages_and_store_status(mm, current_node, &pagelist,
> status, start, i - start - need_move);
> --
> 2.17.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
