"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Towards a more consistent naming scheme. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ... > diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig > index 18e9fb6fcf1b..c703eb6b7461 100644 > --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ config SPARC64 > select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER > select HAVE_KRETPROBES > select HAVE_KPROBES > - select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP > + select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE > select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP > select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE > select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE This resulted in build failure reported by kbuild test robot. Can we fold the below change diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig index c703eb6b7461..02907584be2d 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ config SPARC64 select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER select HAVE_KRETPROBES select HAVE_KPROBES - select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE + select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE We should handle that drop of SMP in a separate patch if needed. -aneesh
