Re: [PATCH] mm: nommu: fix remap_pfn_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 27 May 2011 11:50:03 +0800
Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> remap_pfn_range() does not update vma->end on no mmu arch which will
> cause munmap() fail because it can't match the vma.
> 
> eg. fb_mmap() in fbmem.c will call io_remap_pfn_range() which is
> remap_pfn_range() on nommu arch, if an address is not page aligned vma->start
> will be changed in remap_pfn_range(), but neither size nor vma->end will be
> updated. Then munmap(start, len) can't find the vma to free, because it need to
> compare (start + len) with vma->end.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/nommu.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> index 1fd0c51..829848a 100644
> --- a/mm/nommu.c
> +++ b/mm/nommu.c
> @@ -1817,6 +1817,7 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long from,
>  		unsigned long to, unsigned long size, pgprot_t prot)
>  {
>  	vma->vm_start = vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	vma->vm_end = vma->vm_start + size;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_pfn_range);

hm.

The MMU version of remap_pfn_range() doesn't do this.  Seems that it
just leaves the omitted parts of the vma unmapped.  Obviously nommu
can't do that, but the divergence is always a concern.

Thsi implementation could lead to overlapping vmas.  Should we be
checking that it fits?




--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]