On 10.01.20 15:54, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 03:48:39PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> + if (!present_section_nr(section_nr)) >>>> + return section_nr_to_pfn(next_present_section_nr(section_nr)); >>> >>> This won't compile. next_present_section_nr() is static to mm/sparse.c. >> >> We should then move that to the header IMHO. > > It looks like too much for a trivial cleanup. > Cleanup? This is a performance improvement ("fix the issue."). We should avoid duplicating code where it can be avoided. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb