On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:03:07PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2020-01-09 12:56:33, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 07-01-20 21:44:12, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I updated my userspace to x86-64, and now chromium likes to eat all > > > the memory and bring the system to standstill. > > > > > > Unfortunately, OOM killer does not react: > > > > > > I'm now running "ps aux", and it prints one line every 20 seconds or > > > more. Do we agree that is "unusable" system? I attempted to do kill > > > from other session. > > > > Does sysrq+f help? > > May try that next time. > > > > Do we agree that OOM killer should have reacted way sooner? > > > > This is impossible to answer without knowing what was going on at the > > time. Was the system threshing over page cache/swap? In other words, is > > the system completely out of memory or refaulting the working set all > > the time because it doesn't fit into memory? > > Swap was full, so "completely out of memory", I guess. Chromium does > that fairly often :-(. > Have you considered restricting its memory limits a la `ulimit -m`? I've taken to running browsers in nspawn containers for general isolation improvements, but this also makes it easy to set cgroup resource limits like memcg. i.e. --property MemoryMax=2G This prevents the browser from bogging down the entire system, but it doesn't prevent thrashing before FF OOMs within its control group. I do feel there's a problem with the kernel's reclaim algorithm, it seems far too willing to evict file-backed pages that are recently in use. But at least with memcg this behavior is isolated to the cgroup, though it still generates a crapload of disk reads from all the thrashing. Regards, Vito Caputo