Re: Splitting the mmap_sem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+CC

On 1/7/20 3:27 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>>> Option 2: Add a memalloc_nowait_save/restore API to go along
>>>> with nofs and noio.  That way, we can take the RCU read lock, call
>>>> memalloc_nowait_save(), and walk the VMA tree and the page tables in
>>>> the current order.  There's an increased chance of memory allocation of
>>>> page tables failing, so we'll have to risk that and do a retry with the
>>>> reference count held on the VMA if we need to sleep to allocate memory.
>>>>
>>>> Option 3: Variant of 2 where we add GFP flags to the p??_alloc()
>>>> functions.
>>>
>>> I think this is the most reasonable way. If we are low of memory, latency
>>> is not on the top of priorities.
>>
>> You prefer adding GFP flags over adding a memalloc_nowait_save()?
> 
> I don't have strong preference here.

I think it's generally a good idea to have the memalloc_() scoping.
However, we use the PF_* flags where it now seems 30 out of 32 are used,
and MEMALLOC* already occupies 3 of those.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux