Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Rename mhp_restrictions to mhp_modifiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:17 AM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020-01-08 5:28 a.m., David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 07.01.20 21:59, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >> The mhp_restrictions struct really doesn't specify anything resembling
> >> a restriction anymore so rename it to be mhp_modifiers.
> >
> > I wonder if something like "mhp_params" would be even better. It's
> > essentially just a way to avoid changing call chains rough-out all archs
> > whenever we want to add a new parameter.
>
> Sure, that does sound a bit nicer to me. I can change it for v3.

Oh, I was just about to chime in to support "modifiers" because I
would expect all parameters to folded into a "params" struct. The
modifiers seem to be limited to the set of items that are only
considered in a non-default / expert memory hotplug use cases.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux