Re: [PATCH] kallsyms: work around bogus -Wrestrict warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi.

On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 02:25:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> gee, is that even worth "fixing"?  Oleksandr, I've seen a couple of
> these false positives.  Do we know if anyone is taking them to the gcc
> developers?

I'm not aware of such an effort. I tend to blame compiler as an option
of last resort, but if Arnd gathers enough examples (since he's working
on fixing/working around those), it would be reasonable to suggest him to
hand over those findings to gcc bugtracker.

-- 
  Best regards,
    Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
    Senior Software Maintenance Engineer






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux