Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] tmpfs: Add per-superblock i_ino support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



zhengbin (A) writes:
Use spin_lock will affect performance

"Performance" isn't a binary. In discussions, you should avoid invoking the performance boogeyman without presenting any real-world data. :-)

We already have to take this spin lock before when setting the free inode count. The two sites can be merged, but it seems unnecessary to conflate their purpose at this time.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux