On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:44:06 +0200 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:50:19PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Thu, 26 May 2011 19:30:18 +0900 > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In the next version, I'll try some like.. > > > == > > > process_one_work(...) { > > > ..... > > > spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock); > > > ..... > > > if (cwq->wq->flags & WQ_IDLEPRI) { > > > set_scheduler(...SCHED_IDLE...) > > > cond_resched(); > > > scheduler_switched = true; > > > } > > > f(work) > > > if (scheduler_switched) > > > set_scheduler(...SCHED_OTHER...) > > > spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock); > > > } > > > == > > > Patch size will be much smaller. (Should I do this in memcg's code ??) > > > > > > > BTW, my concern is that if f(work) is enough short,effect of SCHED_IDLE will never > > be found because SCHED_OTHER -> SCHED_IDLE -> SCHED_OTHER switch is very fast. > > Changed "weight" of CFQ never affects the next calculation of vruntime..of the > > thread and the work will show the same behavior with SCHED_OTHER. > > > > I'm sorry if I misunderstand CFQ and setscheduler(). > > Hmm... I'm not too familiar there either but, > > * If prio is lowered (you're gonna lower it too, right?), > prio_changed_fair() is called which in turn does resched_task() as > necessary. > > * More importantly, for short work items, it's likely to not matter at > all. If you can determine beforehand that it's not gonna take very > long time, queueing on system_wq would be more efficient. > > Thanks. > Ok, Now, I use following style. (short work)->requeue->(short work)->requeue I'll change this as (set SCHED_IDLE)->long work (until the end)->(set SCHED_OTHER) Then, I'll see what I want. Thanks. -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>