Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two above-47bit hint address vs. THP bugs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two above-47bit hint address vs. THP bugs
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:25:52 -0800
Cc: "Willhalm, Thomas" <thomas.willhalm@xxxxxxxxx>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, "Bruggeman, Otto G" <otto.g.bruggeman@xxxxxxxxx>, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20191220142548.7118-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
References: <20191220142548.7118-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:25:46 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The two get_unmapped_area() implementations have to be fixed to provide
> THP-friendly mappings if above-47bit hint address is specified.
> 

Do we need a cc:stable for these?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two above-47bit hint address vs. THP bugs
  - From: Kirill A. Shutemov

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] Fix two above-47bit hint address vs. THP bugs
  - From: Kirill A. Shutemov

Prev by Date: Re: [Bug 205937] New: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: f3170000
Next by Date: [Patch v2] mm/rmap.c: split huge pmd when it really is
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] thp: Fix conflict of above-47bit hint address and PMD alignment
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two above-47bit hint address vs. THP bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux