On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> [2011-05-20 15:01:58]:
Do we need this?
> The new API exports numa_maps per-memcg basis. This is a piece of useful
> information where it exports per-memcg page distribution across real numa
> nodes.
>
> One of the usecase is evaluating application performance by combining this
> information w/ the cpu allocation to the application.
>
> The output of the memory.numastat tries to follow w/ simiar format of numa_maps
> like:
>
> total=<total pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
> file=<total file pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
> anon=<total anon pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
> unevictable=<total anon pages> N0=<node 0 pages> N1=<node 1 pages> ...
>
> And we have per-node:
> total = file + anon + unevictable
>
> $ cat /dev/cgroup/memory/memory.numa_stat
> total=250020 N0=87620 N1=52367 N2=45298 N3=64735
> file=225232 N0=83402 N1=46160 N2=40522 N3=55148
> anon=21053 N0=3424 N1=6207 N2=4776 N3=6646
> unevictable=3735 N0=794 N1=0 N2=0 N3=2941
>
> This patch is based on mmotm-2011-05-06-16-39
>
> change v5..v4:
> 1. disable the API non-NUMA kernel.
>
> change v4..v3:
> 1. add per-node "unevictable" value.
> 2. change the functions to be static.
>
> change v3..v2:
> 1. calculate the "total" based on the per-memcg lru size instead of rss+cache.
> this makes the "total" value to be consistant w/ the per-node values follows
> after.
>
> change v2..v1:
> 1. add also the file and anon pages on per-node distribution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index e14677c..ced414b 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1162,6 +1162,93 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> return MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +static unsigned long mem_cgroup_node_nr_file_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + int nid)
> +{
> + unsigned long ret;
> +
> + ret = mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(memcg, nid, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE) +
> + mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(memcg, nid, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long mem_cgroup_nr_file_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + u64 total = 0;
> + int nid;
> +
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
> + total += mem_cgroup_node_nr_file_lru_pages(memcg, nid);
> +
> + return total;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long mem_cgroup_node_nr_anon_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + int nid)
> +{
> + unsigned long ret;
> +
> + ret = mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(memcg, nid, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON) +
> + mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(memcg, nid, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long mem_cgroup_nr_anon_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + u64 total = 0;
> + int nid;
> +
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
> + total += mem_cgroup_node_nr_anon_lru_pages(memcg, nid);
> +
> + return total;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long
> +mem_cgroup_node_nr_unevictable_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
> +{
> + return mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(memcg, nid, LRU_UNEVICTABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long
> +mem_cgroup_nr_unevictable_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + u64 total = 0;
> + int nid;
> +
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
> + total += mem_cgroup_node_nr_unevictable_lru_pages(memcg, nid);
> +
> + return total;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + int nid)
> +{
> + enum lru_list l;
> + u64 total = 0;
> +
> + for_each_lru(l)
> + total += mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(memcg, nid, l);
> +
> + return total;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + u64 total = 0;
> + int nid;
> +
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
> + total += mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid);
> +
> + return total;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> struct zone_reclaim_stat *mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> struct zone *zone)
> {
> @@ -4048,6 +4135,51 @@ mem_cgroup_get_total_stat(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct mcs_total_stat *s)
> mem_cgroup_get_local_stat(iter, s);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +static int mem_control_numa_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> +{
> + int nid;
> + unsigned long total_nr, file_nr, anon_nr, unevictable_nr;
> + unsigned long node_nr;
> + struct cgroup *cont = m->private;
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
> +
> + total_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(mem_cont);
> + seq_printf(m, "total=%lu", total_nr);
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
> + node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(mem_cont, nid);
> + seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
> + }
> + seq_putc(m, '\n');
> +
> + file_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_file_lru_pages(mem_cont);
> + seq_printf(m, "file=%lu", file_nr);
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
> + node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_file_lru_pages(mem_cont, nid);
> + seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
> + }
> + seq_putc(m, '\n');
> +
> + anon_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_anon_lru_pages(mem_cont);
> + seq_printf(m, "anon=%lu", anon_nr);
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
> + node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_anon_lru_pages(mem_cont, nid);
> + seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
> + }
> + seq_putc(m, '\n');
> +
> + unevictable_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_unevictable_lru_pages(mem_cont);
> + seq_printf(m, "unevictable=%lu", unevictable_nr);
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
> + node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_unevictable_lru_pages(mem_cont,
> + nid);
> + seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
> + }
> + seq_putc(m, '\n');
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> static int mem_control_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> struct cgroup_map_cb *cb)
> {
> @@ -4058,6 +4190,7 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> memset(&mystat, 0, sizeof(mystat));
> mem_cgroup_get_local_stat(mem_cont, &mystat);
>
> +
> for (i = 0; i < NR_MCS_STAT; i++) {
> if (i == MCS_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
> continue;
> @@ -4481,6 +4614,22 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +static const struct file_operations mem_control_numa_stat_file_operations = {
> + .read = seq_read,
> + .llseek = seq_lseek,
> + .release = single_release,
> +};
> +
Can't we do this the way we do the stats file? Please see
> +static int mem_control_numa_stat_open(struct inode *unused, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct cgroup *cont = file->f_dentry->d_parent->d_fsdata;
> +
> + file->f_op = &mem_control_numa_stat_file_operations;
> + return single_open(file, mem_control_numa_stat_show, cont);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
> {
> .name = "usage_in_bytes",
> @@ -4544,6 +4693,12 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
> .unregister_event = mem_cgroup_oom_unregister_event,
> .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_OOM_TYPE, OOM_CONTROL),
> },
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + {
> + .name = "numa_stat",
> + .open = mem_control_numa_stat_open,
> + },
> +#endif
mem_control_stat_show().
I looked that earlier but can not get the formating working as well as the seq_*. Is there a particular reason we prefer one than the other?
Thanks
--Ying
--
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> --
> 1.7.3.1
>
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href="" href="mailto:dont@xxxxxxxxx">dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>