On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 5:47 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>:
> Patch series "Generic page walk and ptdump", v15:
> mm: add generic p?d_leaf() macros
> arc: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> arm: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> mips: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> powerpc: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> riscv: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> s390: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> sparc: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> x86: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
> mm: pagewalk: add p4d_entry() and pgd_entry()
> mm: pagewalk: allow walking without vma
> mm: pagewalk: add test_p?d callbacks
> mm: pagewalk: add 'depth' parameter to pte_hole
> x86: mm: point to struct seq_file from struct pg_state
> x86: mm+efi: convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level() to take a mm_struct
> x86: mm: convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level_debugfs() to take an mm_struct
> x86: mm: convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level_core() to take an mm_struct
> mm: add generic ptdump
> x86: mm: convert dump_pagetables to use walk_page_range
> arm64: mm: convert mm/dump.c to use walk_page_range()
> arm64: mm: display non-present entries in ptdump
> mm: ptdump: reduce level numbers by 1 in note_page()
I've dropped these, and since they clearly weren't ready I don't want
to see them re-sent for 5.5.
If somebody figures out the bug, trying again for 5.6 sounds fine.
Linus
