On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 18:02, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > > index ee4eecc7e1c2..de4b2d1e66be 100644 > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > > @@ -363,22 +363,21 @@ unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru, int zone > > for (zid = zone_idx + 1; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) { > > struct zone *zone = &lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->node_zones[zid]; > > unsigned long size; > > > > if (!managed_zone(zone)) > > continue; > > > > if (!mem_cgroup_disabled()) > > size = mem_cgroup_get_zone_lru_size(lruvec, lru, zid); > > else > > - size = zone_page_state(&lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->node_zones[zid], > > - NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru); > > + size = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru); > > Is not this already merged with following commit on next-20191126 ? > > 54eacdb0dd8f9a ("mm: vmscan: simplify lruvec_lru_size()") Yes...That's really a coincidence... I use torvalds' tree to develop but never think this function has been refactored on next tree just a few days ago. Thank you. Regards, Hao Lee