Re: [PATCH v1] mm/memory_hotplug: don't check the nid in find_(smallest|biggest)_section_pfn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Nov 27, 2019, at 3:49 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> (I am a friend of cleaning up and refactoring code to make it easier to
> understand, maintain and extend. I was assuming your mentality is to
> rather keeping code changes minimal if there is a chance to break things
> - I'm sorry if that assumption was wrong.)

Yes, I tested linux-next everyday and saw enough of those cleanup efforts ends up introducing regressions. It is almost every day or two I had to investigate at least one regression and pick the suckers out even though my testing is only focus on MM and friends. However, I do agree if there are worthy cleanup and refactoring but those tiny ones make me uncomfortable. See, I am just trying to save a real vacation for a few weeks in the future, but given the current situation, I’ll need to give up on this project [1] at all because I just have no courage to debug all the regressions there once back.

[1] https://github.com/cailca/linux-mm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux