On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:40:58 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri 22-11-19 23:05:43, Pengfei Li wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:04:01 +0100 > > Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Thu 21-11-19 23:17:52, Pengfei Li wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Since I don't currently have multiple node NUMA systems, I > > > > would be grateful if anyone would like to test this series of > > > > patches. > > > > > > I didn't really get to think about the actual patchset. From a > > > very quick glance I am wondering whether we need to optimize as > > > there are usually only small amount of numa nodes. But I am quite > > > busy so I cannot really do any claims. > > > > Thanks for your comments. > > > > I think it's time to modify the zonelist to nodelist because the > > zonelist is always in node order and the page reclamation is based > > on node. > > > > I will do more performance testing to show that multi-node systems > > will benefit from this series of patches. > > Sensible performance numbers on multiple workloads (ideally some real > world ones rather than artificial microbenchmarks) is essential for a > performance optimization that is this large. Thank you for your suggestion. But this is probably a bit difficult because I don't have a NUMA server to do real-world workload testing. I will do as many performance benchmarks as possible, just like Mel Gorman's "Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v9" (https://lwn.net/Articles/694121/). -- Pengfei