On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 05:00:29AM +0000, Ajay Kaher wrote: > > On 06/11/19, 2:25 PM, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10/25/19 8:18 AM, Ajay Kaher wrote: > >> On 17/10/19, 9:58 PM, "Ajay Kaher" <akaher@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Could we handle arch-specific gup.c in different patch sets and > >>> let these patches to merge to 4.4.y? > >> > >> Vlastimil, please suggest if it's fine to merge these patches to 4.4.y > > > > I'm not sure if it makes much sense to merge them without the arch-specific gup > > support, when we're aware that it's missing. > > > >> and handle arch-specific gup.c in different patch sets starts from 4.19.y, > > > > Actually arch-specific gup.c were removed in 4.13, so it's enough to start from > > 4.9.y, which I'm going to finally look into. > > Yes x86 gup.c is removed. s390 gup.c is present till 4.19, > so if you are making changes in this file for 4.4.y and 4.9.y, > then same should be done for 4.14.y and v4.19.y. Ok, I have no idea what to do here. I have two different series from both of you, yet they are different. Can you both come up with a series you agree on, and send it to me, with both of your acks so that I know this is what should be applied? I've deleted both of your current series from my todo mbox. thanks, greg k-h
