On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 19:58:45 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 00:14:13 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > + /* > > > + * Especially offline memory blocks might not be spanned by the > > > + * node. They will get spanned by the node once they get onlined. > > > + * However, they link to the node in sysfs and can get onlined later. > > > + */ > > > + rc = for_each_memory_block(&nid, check_no_memblock_for_node_cb); > > > + if (rc) > > > return; > > > - } > > > > > > if (check_cpu_on_node(pgdat)) > > > return; > > > > > > > @Andrew, can you queued this one instead of v1 so we can give this some > > more testing? Thanks! > > Sure. > > We have a tested-by but no reviewed-by or acked-by :( > > Null pointer derefs are unpopular. Should we cc:stable? <Crickets> I added cc:stable and shall send it upstream unreviewed.
