On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:09 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >> Hi Colin. >> >> Sorry for bothering you. :( > > No problem at all, I've very happy to re-test. > >> I hope this test is last. >> >> We(Mel, KOSAKI and me) finalized opinion. >> >> Could you test below patch with patch[1/4] of Mel's series(ie, >> !pgdat_balanced Âof sleeping_prematurely)? >> If it is successful, we will try to merge this version instead of >> various cond_resched sprinkling version. > > tested with the patch below + patch[1/4] of Mel's series. Â300 cycles, > 2.5 hrs of soak testing: works OK. > > Colin Thanks, Colin. We are approaching the conclusion for your help. :) Mel, KOSAKI. I will ask test to Andrew Lutomirski. If he doesn't have a problem, let's go, then. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href