On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 04:01:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2011 22:45:09 +0200 > Daniel Kiper <dkiper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 08:36:02PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 May 2011, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > > > > > > This patch contains online_page_callback and apropriate functions for > > > > setting/restoring online page callbacks. It allows to do some machine > > > > specific tasks during online page stage which is required to implement > > > > memory hotplug in virtual machines. Additionally, __online_page_set_limits(), > > > > __online_page_increment_counters() and __online_page_free() function > > > > was added to ease generic hotplug operation. > > > > > > There are several issues with this. > > > > > > First, this is completely racy and only allows one global callback to be > > > in use at a time without looping, which is probably why you had to pass an > > > > One callback is allowed by design. Currently I do not see > > any real usage for more than one callback. > > I'd suggest that you try using the notifier.h tools here and remove the > restriction. Sure, we may never use the capability but I expect the > code will look nice and simple and once it's done, it's done. Hmmm... I am a bit confused. Here https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/28/510 you was against (ab)using notifiers. Here https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/29/313 you proposed currently implemented solution. Maybe I missed something... What should I do now ??? I agree that the code should look nice and simple and once it's done, it's done. Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>