Hello, On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 01:21:25PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hmm, how can we have a task in an offline memcg? I thought that any > existing task will prevent cgroup removal from proceeding. Is this some > sort of race where the task managed to disassociate from the cgroup > while there is still a binding to a memcg existing? What am I missing? The previous cgroup one was from bsd process accounting which happens after the process is marked head. This one IIUC is from core dumping path. Thanks. -- tejun
