On Wed, 18 May 2011 23:14:43 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:25:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:46:21 -0700
> > Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > In fork and exit it's quite common to take same rmap chain locks
> > > again and again when the whole address space is processed for a
> > > address space that has a lot of sharing. Also since the locking
> > > has changed to always lock the root anon_vma this can be very
> > > contended.
> > >
> > > This patch adds a simple wrapper to batch these lock acquisitions
> > > and only reaquire the lock when another is needed. The main
> > > advantage is that when multiple processes are doing this in
> > > parallel they will avoid a lot of communication overhead
> > > on the lock cache line.
> > >
> > > v2: Address review feedback. Drop lockbreak. Rename init function.
> >
> > Doesn't compile:
> >
> > include/linux/rmap.h: In function 'anon_vma_unlock_batch':
> > include/linux/rmap.h:146: error: 'struct anon_vma' has no member named 'lock'
> > mm/rmap.c: In function '__anon_vma_lock_batch':
> > mm/rmap.c:1737: error: 'struct anon_vma' has no member named 'lock'
> > mm/rmap.c:1739: error: 'struct anon_vma' has no member named 'lock'
> >
> > I think I reported this against the v1 patches.
>
> Hmm is that against -mm? Which tree exactly?
>
> Both in Linus' latest and in -next I have
>
> include/linux/rmap.h:
>
> struct anon_vma {
> struct anon_vma *root; /* Root of this anon_vma tree */
> spinlock_t lock; /* Serialize access to vma list */
>
> So it should compile. And it compiles here of course.
ah, whoop, sorry. It's getting turned into a mutex, by
mm-convert-anon_vma-lock-to-a-mutex.patch
> To be honest I forgot where the -mm tree is, so I can't check.
> It's not in its old place on kernel.org anymore?
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
If you dive into the `series' file you'll see that this patch is part of this
series:
mm-mmu_gather-rework.patch
mm-mmu_gather-rework-fix.patch
powerpc-mmu_gather-rework.patch
sparc-mmu_gather-rework.patch
s390-mmu_gather-rework.patch
arm-mmu_gather-rework.patch
sh-mmu_gather-rework.patch
ia64-mmu_gather-rework.patch
um-mmu_gather-rework.patch
mm-now-that-all-old-mmu_gather-code-is-gone-remove-the-storage.patch
mm-powerpc-move-the-rcu-page-table-freeing-into-generic-code.patch
mm-extended-batches-for-generic-mmu_gather.patch
mm-extended-batches-for-generic-mmu_gather-fix.patch
lockdep-mutex-provide-mutex_lock_nest_lock.patch
mm-remove-i_mmap_lock-lockbreak.patch
mm-convert-i_mmap_lock-to-a-mutex.patch
mm-revert-page_lock_anon_vma-lock-annotation.patch
mm-improve-page_lock_anon_vma-comment.patch
mm-use-refcounts-for-page_lock_anon_vma.patch
mm-convert-anon_vma-lock-to-a-mutex.patch
mm-optimize-page_lock_anon_vma-fast-path.patch
mm-uninline-large-generic-tlbh-functions.patch
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>