Re: [PATCH v3] mm: fix trying to reclaim unevictable lru page when calling madvise_pageout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019/11/2 2:32, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 01-11-19 21:50:45, zhong jiang wrote:
>> Recently, I hit the following issue when running in the upstream.
>>
>> kernel BUG at mm/vmscan.c:1521!
>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
>> CPU: 0 PID: 23385 Comm: syz-executor.6 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc4+ #1
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
>> RIP: 0010:shrink_page_list+0x12b6/0x3530 mm/vmscan.c:1521
>> Code: de f5 ff ff e8 ab 79 eb ff 4c 89 f7 e8 43 33 0d 00 e9 cc f5 ff ff e8 99 79 eb ff 48 c7 c6 a0 34 2b a0 4c 89 f7 e8 1a 4d 05 00 <0f> 0b e8 83 79 eb ff 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 38 00 0f 85 74
>> RSP: 0018:ffff88819a3df5a0 EFLAGS: 00010286
>> RAX: 0000000000040000 RBX: ffffea00061c3980 RCX: ffffffff814fba36
>> RDX: 00000000000056f7 RSI: ffffc9000c02c000 RDI: ffff8881f70268cc
>> RBP: ffff88819a3df898 R08: ffffed103ee05de0 R09: ffffed103ee05de0
>> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed103ee05ddf R12: ffff88819a3df6f0
>> R13: ffff88819a3df6f0 R14: ffffea00061c3980 R15: dffffc0000000000
>> FS:  00007f21b9d8e700(0000) GS:ffff8881f7000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: 0000001b2d621000 CR3: 00000001c8c46004 CR4: 00000000007606f0
>> DR0: 0000000020000140 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
>> PKRU: 55555554
>> Call Trace:
>>  reclaim_pages+0x499/0x800 mm/vmscan.c:2188
>>  madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range+0x58a/0x710 mm/madvise.c:453
>>  walk_pmd_range mm/pagewalk.c:53 [inline]
>>  walk_pud_range mm/pagewalk.c:112 [inline]
>>  walk_p4d_range mm/pagewalk.c:139 [inline]
>>  walk_pgd_range mm/pagewalk.c:166 [inline]
>>  __walk_page_range+0x45a/0xc20 mm/pagewalk.c:261
>>  walk_page_range+0x179/0x310 mm/pagewalk.c:349
>>  madvise_pageout_page_range mm/madvise.c:506 [inline]
>>  madvise_pageout+0x1f0/0x330 mm/madvise.c:542
>>  madvise_vma mm/madvise.c:931 [inline]
>>  __do_sys_madvise+0x7d2/0x1600 mm/madvise.c:1113
>>  do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x4c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
>>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>>
>> madvise_pageout access the specified range of the vma and isolate
>> them, then run shrink_page_list to reclaim its memory. But It also
>> isolate the unevictable page to reclaim. Hence, we can catch the
>> cases in shrink_page_list.
>>
>> The root cause is that we scan the page tables instead of specific
>> LRU list. and so we need to filter out the unevictable lru pages
>> from our end.
>>
>> Fixes: 1a4e58cce84e ("mm: introduce MADV_PAGEOUT")
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>
> But I would really appreciate to add a comment for the BUG_ON and
> explain why do we care about PageUnevictable so much when there is an
> explicit page_evictable check in the reclaim path. In other words a
> short summary of what Johannes explained in
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191030193307.GA48128@xxxxxxxxxxx. Maybe in a
> separate patch. Care to send one or should I send it?
Hi,  Michal

Actually,  I am not very clear about the words Johannes had said.   How the race to
tirgger, it will result in an PgeMlocked page can be visible in shrink_page_list.

Could you elaborate the race in detail further ?

Thanks,
zhong jiang
>> ---
>> v2 -> v3:
>>     Modified the mail address to hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>>     Remove BUG_ON is not an good solutions. Becuase it indeed can
>>     see !page_evictable() in shrink_page_list due to some race.  
>>
>>  mm/madvise.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>> index 99dd06f..63e1308 100644
>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>> @@ -363,8 +363,12 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
>>  		ClearPageReferenced(page);
>>  		test_and_clear_page_young(page);
>>  		if (pageout) {
>> -			if (!isolate_lru_page(page))
>> -				list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>> +			if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) {
>> +				if (PageUnevictable(page))
>> +					putback_lru_page(page);
>> +				else
>> +					list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>> +			}
>>  		} else
>>  			deactivate_page(page);
>>  huge_unlock:
>> @@ -441,8 +445,12 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
>>  		ClearPageReferenced(page);
>>  		test_and_clear_page_young(page);
>>  		if (pageout) {
>> -			if (!isolate_lru_page(page))
>> -				list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>> +			if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) {
>> +				if (PageUnevictable(page))
>> +					putback_lru_page(page);
>> +				else
>> +					list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>> +			}
>>  		} else
>>  			deactivate_page(page);
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 1.7.12.4






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux