Re: [PATCH 0/4] v6 Improve task->comm locking situation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 18 May 2011 08:25:54 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>   " Hey, this looks a bit racy and 'top' very rarely, on rare workloads that 
>     play with ->comm[], might display a weird reading task name for a second, 
>     amongst the many other temporarily nonsensical statistical things it 
>     already prints every now and then. "

Well we should at least make sure that `top' won't run off the end of
comm[] and go oops.  I think that's guaranteed by the fact(s) that
init_tasks's comm[15] is zero and is always copied-by-value across
fork and can never be overwritten in any task_struct.

But I didn't check that.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]