On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 06:53:02PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 30-10-19 13:44:55, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > Also, I think we should use sc.gfp_mask & ~__GFP_THISNODE, so that > > allocations with a physical node preference still do node-agnostic > > reclaim for the purpose of cgroup accounting. > > Do not we exclude that by GFP_RECLAIM_MASK already? My bad, you're right. Scratch that, then. Thanks.
